Tigran Gambaryan, an embattled Binance executive, recently took to social media to share his dramatic account of his incarceration in Nigeria. His claims—ranging from bribery solicitation to high-level corruption—set off a firestorm of debates. But while his allegations against unnamed lawmakers gained traction, his attempt to implicate Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Malam Nuhu Ribadu, fell flat.
Ribadu’s longstanding reputation for integrity, including his famous rejection of a $15 million bribe during his tenure as EFCC Chairman, contradicts Gambaryan’s claim that he sought “billions” for a political future. Public figures and analysts, including Professor Farooq Kperogi, have dismissed these accusations as implausible, pointing out the lack of evidence and the sheer improbability of the scenario.
What Gambaryan’s narrative conveniently sidesteps is Binance’s alleged involvement in money laundering and financial misconduct in Nigeria. His claims appear more like a diversion tactic than a genuine exposé. With his colleague Nadeem Anjarwalla fleeing detention rather than facing trial, the credibility of Binance’s stance is further questioned.
In the end, Gambaryan’s claims are not just unsubstantiated; they reflect a calculated attempt to shift the narrative. However, in law and in reality, the burden of proof lies with the accuser—something he has yet to meet.
