Judge Slams ‘Unlawful’ USAID Funding Freeze as Potential Constitutional Violation

JUDGE RULES TRUMP’S USAID FUNDING FREEZE LIKELY VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION

A federal judge has ruled that former President Donald Trump overstepped his constitutional authority by suspending USAID funding, stating that the move likely violated the U.S. Constitution.

COURT DECISION SHAKES UP FOREIGN AID POLICY

Judge Amir Ali determined that the Trump administration unlawfully halted funds that were already appropriated by Congress for international aid programs. The ruling underscores a crucial separation of powers issue, emphasizing that Congress—not the President—controls federal spending.

Despite the ruling, the judge did not order the reinstatement of the 5,200 canceled USAID programs, which provided critical humanitarian assistance worldwide. However, he mandated that the government expedite payments for completed work, addressing delays that have significantly disrupted global aid efforts.

IMPACT ON HUMANITARIAN AID AND FOREIGN POLICY

The suspension of USAID funding under the Trump administration was met with heavy criticism from humanitarian organizations and foreign policy experts. Many argue that the abrupt halt jeopardized critical programs aimed at global health, economic development, and disaster relief.

The ruling reignites debates over executive power and Congressional authority, setting a potential precedent for future administrations. While Trump’s team has defended the decision as an effort to reassess foreign aid spending, critics claim it undermined U.S. global leadership and national security interests.

WHAT COMES NEXT?

The ruling leaves the door open for further legal battles and policy shifts under the current administration. As the government moves forward with processing outstanding payments, the future of U.S. foreign aid remains uncertain.

Stay tuned for updates as this developing story unfolds.